“By What Authority Do You Do These Things?”
W
hen
Jesus finished the sermon on the mount Scripture tells us that the people
were amazed, “for He taught them as one having authority, and not as the
scribes” (Matthew 7:29, NKJV). Joseph Henry Thayer in his Greek-English
Lexicon of the New Testament tells us that the word exousia,
translated “authority” here, means “…the power of rule or government (the power
of him whose will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed)…”
(225). When Jesus taught He was giving commands that the people were to obey.
This was different from the approach which the scribes and pharisees used.
This demonstration of
authority was not always well received. Matthew, Mark, and Luke all tell us of
an occasion when the chief priests, scribes and elders asked Jesus “…By what
authority are You doing these things? And who gave You this authority?” (Matthew
21:23, cf. Mark 11:28 and Luke 20:2). On this occasion, because of the
hardness of their hearts in rejecting John the Baptist, Jesus did not answer
their question directly. However, on other occasions, He directly addressed
this issue. John tells us in three passages how explicitly Jesus answered this
matter. In John 7:16 Jesus said, “…My doctrine is not Mine, but His who
sent Me.” In John 12:49 He said, “For I have not spoken on My own
authority; but the Father who sent Me gave Me a command, what I should say and
what I should speak.” And finally, in John 14:24 He said, “…the word
which you hear is not Mine but the Father’s who sent Me.” Jesus, declared
with these words that He Himself, God the Son, was acting under the authority
of God the Father.
After Jesus’
resurrection, the extent of Jesus’ authority was broadened. As He gave His
apostles the charge to teach all the nations, He began with the words, “…All
authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth.” (Matthew 28:18).
This tells us that God the Father gave to Jesus the right to command all the
universe. As a result all of the universe is obligated to obey Jesus’
teachings and to submit to His authority. This was promised in Deuteronomy
18:18-19, when God told Moses, “I will raise up for them a Prophet like you
from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall
speak to them all that I command Him. And it shall be that whoever will not
hear My words, which He speaks in My name, I will require it of him.”
When the apostles went
out to preach they acknowledged divine authority, and held themselves under
such authority. In the first sermon they preached, they taught the Jews on the
day of Pentecost to, “…Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the
name of Jesus Christ…” (Acts 2:38). The apostle Paul taught the Christians
in Colosse, “And whatever you do in word or deed, [do] all in the name of
the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him” (Colossians
3:17). To act in the name of Jesus is to act with and under the
authority of Jesus. This meant that the apostles’ message, like that of Jesus,
was not their own but from the One who sent them. Paul praised the church in
Thessalonica saying, “…when you received the word of God which you heard
from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the
word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe” (1
Thessalonians 2:13). The writings of the apostles held the same authority.
Paul wrote to the Corinthians, “If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or
spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the
commandments of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 14:37).
Just as God had
promised to give authority to Jesus, Jesus promised to give authority to His
apostles. Jesus encouraged His disciples saying, “…when they deliver you
up, do not worry about how or what you should speak. For it will be given to
you in that hour what you should speak; for it is not you who speak, but the
Spirit of your Father who speaks in you” (Matthew 10:19-20). If people
rejected the message of the apostles, Jesus taught that it was the same as
rejecting Him and rejecting God the Father. Luke tells us that Jesus told His
apostles, “He who hears you hears Me, he who rejects you rejects Me, and he
who rejects Me rejects Him who sent Me” (Luke 10:16).
When we look to the
Bible we have the written teachings of Jesus. Whether we look at the Gospel
accounts of Jesus’ words while on the earth or the records of what the apostles
taught, we have before us the teachings (or doctrine) of Jesus. This is
the standard of authority that must be obeyed. This is the source from which
we must derive the authority for all that we say and do in service to God.
How can we establish
from Scripture authority for what we do in service to God? First we must
understand what the Bible is. Quite simply, it is the written will of God. It
was given to the apostles and prophets of the first century in order to
communicate understandable information to ordinary human beings. When Paul
wrote to the Ephesians, he claimed that the things which he wrote explained the
plan of God which had previously been a mystery. He told them, “…when you
read, you may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ, which in other
ages was not made known to the sons of men, as it has now been revealed by the
Spirit to His holy apostles and prophets” (Ephesians 3:4-5). When Paul
tells them, “when you read, you may understand” it shows us that Scripture is
not some dark enigma that can not be unraveled, but written communication that
can be understood just as we do any other type of written communication.
When we read a letter,
a story, an article, or some type of instructional literature we use the same
basic methods to discern the meaning of the material. We consider what the
document states directly, what it describes and what it infers about the
subject in question. All of this information is taken into account in order to
assertain the content of the piece. The Bible is no different. There are
direct statements which explicitly command or direct behavior. There are descriptions
of behavior that is approved or condemned. There are, in the context of some
broader discussion, details which are inferred that may further clarify the
meaning of a particular issue.
If we are going to act
under the authority of Jesus in what we do in service to God what will
determine whether or not we have authority for the things we do? There are
many direct statements that are in the Bible. Some are given to specific
individuals and not to anyone else (e.g. Abraham’s charge to sacrifice Isaac –
Genesis 22:2). Other commands fall under under a distinct period of
jurisdiction, and do not apply to those under Christ (e.g. animal sacrifice
under the Law of Moses no longer applies to man today). If Jesus Christ now
has all authority, and He gave His instructions to His apostles, it would
follow that the first source we should look to in order to establish authority
would be the direct commands of Jesus and His apostles.
Next, we look to the
descriptions of things in the Bible. Again, if we are interested in acting
under the authority of Christ our pattern cannot be drawn from descriptions of
behavior that was not subject to the authority of Christ (e.g. Israel under the
Law of Moses or Gentiles when they were without God). That brings us to what
is described in the New Testament. Here we find descriptions of things that
were approved and things that were not approved. If Jesus taught that
rejection of the apostles was rejection of Him (Luke 10:16), it would follow
that those descriptions which serve as binding examples to us today are the
approved examples of behavior carried out under Christ and the apostles.
Finally, as a piece of
written material, the Bible is filled with numerous topics and discussions of
issues. The inferences within these discourses to things that have been
commanded or described further clarifies the application of what is authorized
under Christ. As with any literature, inferences are often more subjective
(i.e. subject to personal opinion and perspective) than direct statements or
descriptions. One person might draw an inference from some nuance of wording
that totally eludes another person. Or, there might be inferential references
to things that are incidental to the matter under consideration. Because of these
dangers when we look to the inferences of Scripture we must look to those
necessary inferences that clarify approved examples or direct commands. When
such inferences offer inescapable conclusions about a matter under
consideration, they establish authority for action in service to God.
Many in the world
conduct themselves as if there is no need to establish divine authority in
religion. The question posed to Jesus remains particularly applicable today,
“by what authority are you doing these things?” Jesus and the apostles acted
under divine authority. What about us?
Kyle Pope